Courage to Get Out of Afghanistan

Posted by: Bill Pearlman
Published on June 12th, 2010 @ 09:21:09 am , using 773 words
Category: Commentary

Bob Herbert in a NY Times editorial states what is becoming obvious: there is really no progress and no clear objective in Afghanistan that merits the continual shuffling of troops in & out of there, at tremendous expense. We are being fed lines by the govenment and the military and it is becoming clearer that there is dissembling of every kind on all sides. It is courage that is needed to leave, not dig a bigger hole.

 

Seven American soldiers were killed in Afghanistan on Monday but hardly anyone noticed. Far more concern is being expressed for the wildlife threatened by the oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico than for the G.I.’s being blown up in the wilds of Afghanistan.

Early this year, we were told that at long last the tide had turned in Afghanistan, that the biggest offensive of the war by American, British and Afghan troops was under way in Marja, a town in Helmand Province in the southern part of the country. The goal, as outlined by Gen. Stanley McChrystal, our senior military commander in Afghanistan, was to rout the Taliban and install a splendid new government that would be responsive to the people and beloved by them.

That triumph would soon be followed by another military initiative in the much larger expanse of neighboring Kandahar Province. The Times’s Rod Nordland explained what was supposed to happen in a front-page article this week:

“The goal that American planners originally outlined — often in briefings in which reporters agreed not to quote officials by name — emphasized the importance of a military offensive devised to bring all of the populous and Taliban-dominated south under effective control by the end of this summer. That would leave another year to consolidate gains before President Obama’s July 2011 deadline to begin withdrawing combat troops.”

Forget about it. Commanders can’t even point to a clear-cut success in Marja. As for Kandahar, no one will even use the word “offensive” to describe the military operations there. The talk now is of moving ahead with civilian reconstruction projects, a “civilian surge,” as Mr. Nordland noted.

What’s happening in Afghanistan is not only tragic, it’s embarrassing. The American troops will fight, but the Afghan troops who are supposed to be their allies are a lost cause. The government of President Hamid Karzai is breathtakingly corrupt and incompetent — and widely unpopular to boot. And now, as The Times’s Dexter Filkins is reporting, the erratic Mr. Karzai seems to be giving up hope that the U.S. can prevail in the war and is making nice with the Taliban.

There is no overall game plan, no real strategy or coherent goals, to guide the fighting of U.S. forces. It’s just a mind-numbing, soul-chilling, body-destroying slog, month after month, year after pointless year. The 18-year-olds fighting (and, increasingly, dying) in Afghanistan now were just 9 or 10 when the World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked in 2001.

Americans have zoned out on this war. They don’t even want to think about it. They don’t want their taxes raised to pay for it, even as they say in poll after poll that they are worried about budget deficits. The vast majority do not want their sons or daughters anywhere near Afghanistan.

Why in the world should the small percentage of the population that has volunteered for military service shoulder the entire burden of this hapless, endless effort? The truth is that top American officials do not believe the war can be won but do not know how to end it. So we get gibberish about empowering the unempowerable Afghan forces and rebuilding a hopelessly corrupt and incompetent civil society.

Our government leaders keep mouthing platitudes about objectives that are not achievable, which is a form of deception that should be unacceptable in a free society.

In announcing, during a speech at West Point in December, that 30,000 additional troops would be sent to Afghanistan, President Obama said: “As your commander in chief, I owe you a mission that is clearly defined and worthy of your service.”

That clearly defined mission never materialized.

Ultimately, the public is at fault for this catastrophe in Afghanistan, where more than 1,000 G.I.’s have now lost their lives. If we don’t have the courage as a people to fight and share in the sacrifices when our nation is at war, if we’re unwilling to seriously think about the war and hold our leaders accountable for the way it is conducted, if we’re not even willing to pay for it, then we should at least have the courage to pull our valiant forces out of it.

Bob Herbert

NY Times 6-12-10

1 comment

Comment from: Steven Belasco [Visitor]
It is too much to expect: No politician – let alone one who has just brought off an historic quickening of the national spirit – no politician goes willingly to sure defeat and temporary ignominy. The pre-teen response to 9/11 that Bush-Cheney gave us, its blustery ignorance, its self-righteous simplification, its appeal to the Hollywood western that seems to inhabit the American soul … that response could never compel realities to conform to its fiction. It gave much of America what it wanted in the way that Roman emperors gave Romans gladiatorial spectacles. It was an entertainment. And as dead serious as flag-draped coffins and mass graves surely are, they cannot make noble the undertakings of folly. But who will step forward to call the godforsaken loss of life, the pain of loss, the destruction precisely what it is: a massive waste stemming from an almost childlike view of the world? He who does so will be hounded off the political edge and left desiring only to be forgotten. So it can hardly surprise that we are condemned to see this ugliness drag on and on until some rhetorical device [“peace with honor”] surfaces at the right moment and allows us to turn tail and yet preserve our infantile fantasies.
Karzai is a popular target. He won’t play Mr. Smith goes to Washington. He is a realist. He, as much as anyone, recognizes that the purported objectives of Amercian policy in Afghanistan consist of fictions that don’t exist in the real world. They are lovely fictions. But they are no more achievable than use of the moon in a fondue. The problem is not Karzai. The problem is us. We will not make Afghanistan a functioning democracy with protections for the minority and guarantees for the individual. It may evolve in that direction. It may not. Who knows in what direction the world’s political systems are evolving? We ourselves are losing our own middle class and drifting toward some variety of corporate financed oligarchy.
Obama is not suicidal. In many ways he is helping us move in the same direction that most societies are moving and doing it with very small steps. He is very adept and we are lucky to have him. But he is not going to “win” in Afghanistan and he is not going to do what I would: get out tomorrow. Maybe the idea is to let the whole effort drift so far into the margins of American consciousness that no one will notice when we slip quietly away. As for those who will whine and moan about the loss of honor, credibility and trust: Honor has on more than one occasion two-timed courage with stupidity. And credibility and trust always depend on conditions on the ground.

06/13/10 @ 11:08

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)